And they do have their niche with that, which is big enterprise-y, centrally administered systems.ĭoes Gnome really have a niche there? I know of three places with large Linux deployments (as in hundreds of stations). > Could cut straight to the GNOME logo after that sentence. It's the flagship experience for power users (not the type that only ever wants to see a terminal). If you ever wanted to have all of the features and options that a desktop OS could have, KDE comes far too close to that. Even the most lightweight of desktop environments like LXDE/LXQt often have more features than GNOME.Īnd KDE is what you get when you take this feature per resource usage ratio of these lightweight environments and then multiply it by the resources that a modern system can easily provide. I'm not saying it's impossible for you to like GNOME better, but there's so many desktop environments out there that are developed from users for users, which are actually objectively better than GNOME in so many categories. OpenSUSE is still holding against, but SUSE uses GNOME in SLED, too, and has been spreading a sort of "We like all desktop environments in *SUSE-land"-mentality, which makes me feel like they're wanting to swap out KDE here, too, at some point.īut yeah, if you haven't yet, do yourself and the Linux desktop a favor and give KDE a fair try. Arch and Gentoo don't have an opinion at all, for obvious reasons. Debian, too, which doesn't really have an opinion, but it's what they've always used and it's stable. I have no problem with one of the many desktop environments specializing in that, but the Linux desktop is mainly controlled by companies who then develop and set GNOME as default on their distros, which are also used by people who do need to administer their PC. Can't accidently hide your panel, if you actually cannot hide your panel at all. Or rather to do something not so smart and then need tech support to fix it. If the user doesn't need to administer things themselves, then not exposing ways of administration in the GUI means less ways for the user to hurt themselves. This is sort of what they do, yeah.Īnd they do have their niche with that, which is big enterprise-y, centrally administered systems. It seems wilfully destructive to remove something that is depended on by so many without making sure there's a replacement in place first.Ĭould cut straight to the GNOME logo after that sentence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |